This is the funniest thing I have heard in a long, long time. 210.54.2.243 21:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC) (not logged in, Nzgabriel.)
Personally, I think the headline is a bit off. It says that the golfer is suing Wikipedia itself, when the opening paragraph states it’s the Wikipedia editor who vandalised the article. Which is more correct? Dragei 21:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
First “wrote a biased paragraph about him” isn’t sufficient information. We’ll need the exact quotes (and ideally a link to the wikipedia article versions).
Second I suspect this article has incorect information since his pedia article has no edits between August 2006 and January 2007. I’m not sure why you’d bother deleting these edits. Otoh, if edits were delted, this article needs to say so, since it appears false otherwise. Nyarlathotep 03:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Here are the court documents which include the quotes apperently. Nyarlathotep 03:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)